My book 'The theory of Infinity: The End of
God' is quite a read - but only if you really give a shit about the search for scientific
'reality', the search for how a universe actually 'comes to be', and, only if you really want to understand
the true nature of the endless playground 'in which it (our universe) resides'.
My book is all about my 'initial thinking' on our universe and the true nature of Gravity and its' influence and
effect on the physical structure and cosmology of our universe. I was not until after I wrote my book that I attempted
to establish the mathematics that would incontrovertibly prove my 'take' on our universe and the true mechanics/physics
of the Gravitional Force within.
You see 'initially' I (a person of
some intelligence) thought that I was not 'smart enough' to produce the 'original mathematics' that would
cement my 'take' on Gravity - I thought that I was not 'smart enough' to mathematically make it obvious and
indisputable that I was 'Dead Correct' on my determination on how 'Gravity' is actually manifest throughout
our universe (and beyond). Well, I was wrong - as it turns-out I not only established the 'original equations' that
perfectly verifies my 'take' on Gravitational Mechanics, I also finished Isaac Newton's 'correct'
(though vague thus incomplete) equation. Need I say that I have proved Einstein's Gravity of Space-time 'Curvature'
to be a mistake that has been misleading scientists for the whole of the past century's 100 years - a
mistake still viewed as valid to this very day.
For those
readers that may be considdering the purchase of my book, please be aware of the following:
To this point (approximately four years after my book's publishing) I have only found 'one'
error in my thinking, and, this error is/was the result of my not having established the mathematics of my new
revolutionary 'take' on 'Gravity' until a couple of years later (after being published). The error 'itself' is that (in my book, specifically in Chapter 7 entitled 'A Century of
Incorrectly Perceiving Gravity') I mistakenly expounded on (established) Space-time Density (thus
Gravity) as being that of a 8 to 1 ratio (every time the distance from a matter mass is 'cut in half') and a 1 to
8 ratio (every time the distance from a matter mass is 'doubled'). I probably mention this mistake numerous times
throughout the book. Though this 8 to 1 and 1 to 8 ratio thinking is 'correct' when
it comes to spatial volume decrease and increase vis-a-vis radial distance decrease 'to' and increase
'from' given matter masses, it is 'incorrect' when it comes to spherical radius surface area density
decrease and increase vis-a-vis spherical radius distance decrease 'to' and increase 'from' given matter
masses - a correction which I have subsequently mathematically shown/proven (in accordance with Newton's Law) to be a
4 to 1 and 1 to 4 ratio in all eight of my scientific papers and mathematical proofs, all of which are available on Page
2 of this website.